The essays in this strong collection shed new light on the defining issues of the Civil War era. Orville Vernon Burton, Leonne M. Hudson, and Daniel E.
Today my Civil War classes finished watching the movie Glory, which is still my all-time favorite Civil War movie.
Students enjoy the movie in part because of the heroic story of the unit and the performances by Denzell Washington, Morgan Freeman, and Matthew Broderick. The movie does a very good job of addressing the discrimination faced by the 54th Massachusetts as well as their heroic performance at Battery Wagner in July Like all historical movies Glory gets certain things right and certain things wrong.
One of the themes that the movie captures is the slow progress that Col. Shaw experienced in learning to more closely empathize with his men as well as the gradual changes that took place among white Union soldiers as they questioned their own racial outlook in response to the battlefield prowess of black regiments like the 54th.
This is an issue that my students recently read about in an article by Chandra Manning. As for problems, well, they abound throughout the movie such as the profile of the regiment, which is presented primarily as a unit of fugitive slaves.
Most of the men were free blacks from Massachusetts. Beyond pointing out such oversights throughout the movie I want my students to be able to think critically about the choices that go into historically-inspired movies such as Glory.
Such questions can include character development and the broader message that movie producers and writers hope to convey to their audience.
In reference to Glory what stands out to me is the emphasis on a progressive story where the individual characters as well as the unit itself becomes more closely connected or identified with the national goal of emancipation and nationalism. Shaw played by Broderick volunteers his regiment in the attack on Battery Wagner as a means of impressing upon the nation the sacrifices and bravery displayed by his men.
Tripp played by Washington begins the movie with an overtly selfish perspective, gradually comes to see the regiment as family, and finally falls in battle while holding the stars and stripes. Even Thomas, who represents the free black men of the regiment and comes to learn during training that he has more in common with fugitive slaves, finds redemption and self-respect by volunteering to carry the flag before the assault on Wagner.
The decision to end the movie with the failed assault at Wagner solidifies this progressive theme, which links the men to one another and, supposedly, the goal of the United States by the middle of the war.
The final scenes depict the grim reality of the battlefield, including shoe-less dead black soldiers, and a mass grave in which both Shaw and his men are buried. As the movie ends the viewer is told that the performance of the 54th Massachusetts led to the recruitment of upwards ofmen and that President Lincoln credited these men with turning the tide of war.
The upshot is that the viewer finishes the movie with the impression that the story of the 54th has been brought to its completion, in large part, because of the death of Shaw.
It is through defeat and death in the regiment that the nation experiences a new birth of freedom. The problem is that this completely ignores the history of the regiment through to the end of the war and the challenges that it continued to face.
In fact, a broader look at the history of the 54th suggests that it was not at the hands of angry Confederate soldiers that constituted the gravest threat to black Union soldiers, but their own government.
The article does an excellent job of detailing the steps that both the men of the 54th and its new colonel took to convince the Lincoln administration to rectify the situation.
The situation continued to deteriorate following the Federal defeat at Olustee, Florida as tension in the ranks grew culminating in cases of mutinous discontent. Shortly thereafter, Private Wallace Baker was arrested and executed for striking an officer after refusing to obey an order to fall in for company inspection, also in protest over pay.
It was not until July that Congress revoked its stance on the issue and awarded the men equal pay from the first day of their service. I am hoping that this broader focus will give us much to discuss in class tomorrow.
This reminds me of my favorite scene in the movie which precedes the assault at Wagner.
|See a Problem?||He is the only person to have been so punished for that crime since the Civil War. Unfortunately, he was also immobilized by shelling.|
|Beyond the Battlefield - Essay||Race, Memory and the American Civil War, is an intriguing look back into the Civil War era which is very heavily studied but misunderstood according to Blight. Blight focuses on how memory shapes history Blight feels, while the Civil War accomplished it goal of abolishing slavery, it fell short of its ultimate potential to pave the way for equality.|
Shaw approaches Tripp and asks him to carry the regimental colors in the next engagement. Tripp refuses and a brief conversation ensues regarding the possible consequences of the war.American Stamp Dealers Association. Buy your subscription to the American Stamp Dealer & Collector Magazine.
Free spanish-american war papers, essays, and research papers. The three essays in this volume present an introduction to history of the emancipation of the slaves during the Civil War. The first essay traces the destruction of slavery by discussing the shift from a war for the Union to a war against slavery.
During the American Civil War, Arkansas was a Confederate state, though it had initially voted to remain in the timberdesignmag.coming the capture of Fort Sumter in April , Abraham Lincoln called for troops from every Union state to put down the rebellion, and Arkansas and several other states seceded.
For the rest of the war, Arkansas played a major role in controlling the vital Mississippi. In The Battlefield and Beyond leading Civil War historians explore a tragic part of our nation’s history though the lenses of race, gender, leadership, politics, and memory.
The essays in this strong collection shed new light on the defining issues of the Civil War era. By Carl Zebrowski 8/19/ • American History Magazine.
Ten Civil War historians provide some contrasting–and probably controversial–views on how and why .