Support[ edit ] Would prevent many U. I cannot associate myself with such ideas. I am surprised that very worthy people—but people who in most cases had no intention of proceeding to the Japanese front themselves—should adopt the position that rather than throw this bomb, we should have sacrificed a million American and a quarter of a million British lives. Two landings were planned:
To the American people Atmoic bomb outline essay example were weary from the long and brutal war, such a drastic measure seemed a necessary, even righteous way to end the madness that was World War II.
However, the madness had just begun.
That August morning was the day that heralded the dawn of the nuclear age, and with it came more than just the loss of lives.
According to Archibald MacLeish, a U. The fear is real, more real today than ever, for the ease at which a nuclear bomb is achieved in this day and age sparks fear in the hearts of most people on this planet. If we do not devise some greater and more equitable system, Armageddon will be at our door.
The goal of waging war is victory with minimum losses on one's own side and, if possible, on the enemy's side. No one disputes the fact that the Japanese military was prepared to fight to the last man to defend the home islands, and indeed had already demonstrated this determination in previous Pacific island campaigns.
A weapon originally developed to contain a Nazi atomic project was available that would spare Americans hundreds of thousands of causalities in an invasion of Japan, and-not incidentally-save several times more than that among Japanese soldiers and civilians.
The thousands who have died in the atomic attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were far less than would have died in an allied invasion, and their sudden deaths convinced the Japanese military to surrender.
Every nation has an interest in being at peace with other nations, but there has never been a time when the world was free of the scourge of war. Hence, peaceful nations must always have adequate military force at their disposal in order to deter or defeat the aggressive designs of rogue nations.
The United States was therefore right in using whatever means were necessary to defeat the Japanese empire in the war which the latter began, including the use of superior or more powerful weaponry-not only to defeat Japan but to remain able following the war to maintain peace sufficiently to guarantee its own existence.
A long, costly and bloody conflict is a wasteful use of a nation's resources when quicker, more decisive means are available. Japan was not then-or later-the only nation America had to restrain, and an all-out U.
Finally, we can never forget the maxim of Edmund Burke: We could no longer "do nothing" but were compelled to "do something" to roll back the Japanese militarists.
Victims of aggression have every right both to end the aggression and to prevent the perpetrator of it from continuing or renewing it.
Our natural right of self defense as well as our moral duty to defeat tyranny justified our decision to wage the war and, ultimately, to drop the atomic bomb.
We should expect political leaders to be guided by moral principles but this does not mean they must subject millions of people to needless injury or death out of a misplaced concern for the safety of enemy soldiers or civilians.
President Truman's decision to deploy atomic power in Japan revealed a man who understood the moral issues at stake and who had the courage to strike a decisive blow that quickly brought to an end the most destructive war in human history. Squeamishness is not a moral principle, but making the best decisions at the time, given the circumstances, is clear evidence that the decision maker is guided by morality.
The atomic bomb was considered a "quick" and even economical way to win the war; however, it was a cruel and unusual form of punishment for the Japanese citizens.
The weapon that we refer to as "quick" was just the opposite. On one hand, it meant a quick end to the war for the United States, and on the other hand, a slow and painful death to many innocent Japanese.
According to a book called Hiroshima Plus 20 the effects of radiation poisoning are horrific, ranging from purple spots on the skin, hair loss, nausea, vomiting, bleeding from the mouth, gums, and throat, weakened immune systems, to massive internal hemorrhaging, not to mention the disfiguring radiation burns.
The effects of the radiation poisoning continued to show up until about a month after the bombing. In fact the bomb also killed or permanently damaged fetuses in the womb. Death and destruction are always a reality of war; however, a quick death is always more humanitarian.
When this powerful nation called the United States dropped the bomb, we sent out the official "go ahead" for the rest of the world that nuclear weapons were a viable means of warfare. We unofficially announced that it was O. The thought that atomic weapons are needed to keep the peace is exactly the idea that fueled the cold war.
Albert Einstein said in a speech, "The armament race between the U. On both sides, the means of mass-destruction are perfected with feverish haste.
The H-bomb appears on the public horizon as a probably attainable goal. Its accelerated development has been solemnly proclaimed by the president. In the words of James Conant, President of Harvard, "The extreme dangers to mankind inherent in the proposal wholly outweigh any military advantage.
That seems to be the main point of the argument against dropping the atomic bomb on Japanese cities in August, Yet this judgment completely abstracts from the concrete circumstances in which the decision was made-a world exhausted by war; an implacable, cunning and ruthless enemy; hundreds of thousands of casualties in an allied invasion of Japan; permanent strategic considerations; and the like.
In other words, the reply fails to meet the argument for dropping the bomb and changes the subject from "the immediate decision to the long-term consequences of the decision.Nuclear warfare (sometimes atomic warfare or thermonuclear warfare) is a military conflict or political strategy in which nuclear weaponry is used to inflict damage on the enemy.
Nuclear weapons are weapons of mass destruction ; in contrast to conventional warfare, nuclear warfare can produce destruction in a much shorter time and can have a. The bomb also set an example to other nations of the war of the devastation that is caused by these types of weapons.
The dropping of the atomic bomb on Japan was necessary for the United States to end the war in Japan and move resources to finish the war in Europe. paper, research paper, term paper, argumentative paper/essay, analysis paper/essay, informative essay, position paper), but all of these assignments have the same goal and principles.
Watch video · The atomic bomb, and nuclear bombs, are powerful weapons that use nuclear reactions as their source of explosive energy.
Scientists first developed nuclear . The United States conducts the first test of the atomic bomb at at the Trinity bomb site in central New timberdesignmag.com terrifying new weapon would quickly become a focal point in the Cold War between.
The bomb also set an example to other nations of the war of the devastation that is caused by these types of weapons. The dropping of the atomic bomb on Japan was necessary for the United States to end the war in Japan and move resources to finish the war in Europe.